• Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Art of Composing

Let's learn to compose together.

  • Start Here
  • Courses
    • Fundamentals (101)
    • Sonata Form (201)
  • Podcast
  • Video
  • Articles
    • Form
    • Harmony
    • Melody
    • Orchestration
    • Process
  • About
    • Contact
    • Listen to My Music
  • Composing Resources
    • Recommended Books
    • Orchestration Resources
    • Forum
    • Archives
You are here: Home / Questions / Why is this chord progression a prolongation?

Why is this chord progression a prolongation?

June 13, 2018 By

Forum › Category: Harmony › Why is this chord progression a prolongation?
0 Vote Up Vote Down
Hector Ricardo M asked 7 years ago

On minute 18:00 in the “Harmony Part 1-5: Harmonic Functions and Progressions” video, regarding Substitute Chords, the progression in the middle is:
IV – (ii) – V.     (The real chords are F – Dm – G)
Why is this considered a prolongation chord progression? Which chord is being prolonged? How can V be related to IV or ii?

Related posts:

  1. Proper notation for harmonic minor scale sharps on keys that include flats Hi In minor scales that include flats, like D-minor, should...
  2. Applied dominant for ii° in minor chord progressions In the workbook for Composition 101, page 61, instruction 7,...
  3. V/V chords On page 58 point  of the manual it basically states...
  4. Other Forms and Pieces Hi, I was wondering what other forms are there besides...
  5. cant access this lesson? Hi Jon, it was working then suddenly stopped, im enrolled...
  6. intervals, notation, theoretic scales, how do you notate triple sharp/flat in musescore?, and in...
  7. Essential Reading? Hi I’d love to know, particularly from Jon, but also...
Question Tags: prolongation chord progression
1 Answers
0 Vote Up Vote Down
Jon Brantingham Staff answered 7 years ago

It can really be considered both. Think of this as two ways to imagine a progression.

In way of thinking, the progression is just IV – V, and then later on, you realize you can add in ii as a passing chord because it is a valid substitution. You could also just completely replace the IV.

In the other way of thinking, you write a diatonic progression that proceeds from IV to ii to V.

With music, just like in math, there are different ways of thinking about the same problem.

Thanks for the question.

Jon Brantingham Staff replied 7 years ago

That would be correct.

Hector Ricardo M replied 7 years ago

So in fact, using the first way of thinking that you stated, the chord being prolonged is IV, isn’t it? We prolong the IV chord by adding the ii chord, and the V chord is in reality a new chord in the progression that has nothing to do with the previous prolongation.
Am I right, or did I miss something?

Thanks for your answer.

Footer CTA

  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • FAQs
  • Login
  • Merch
  • Courses

Copyright © 2025 · Art of Composing