When I sit down to think about why Art of Composing exists, the initial thought is To Make Better Composers. This on the surface feels like it’s generally in the right direction, but it’s also very problematic. What is a better composer?
What is a Better Composer?
So I am going to attempt to break this down, at least how it stands in my mind. This has a lot to do with the last article I wrote, on the science of becoming a better composer.
The Better Composer is in the Ear of the Beholder
The first problem is that everyone has different goals, tastes, backgrounds, genres, stylistic trends… it’s not clear what better means, and so I think the word needs to be split up.
If we look at the term better, these definitions jump out at me:
Adjective
- more appropriate, advantageous, or well advised.
- partly or fully recovered from illness, injury, or mental stress; less unwell.
Verb
- improve on or surpass (an existing or previous level or achievement).
- overcome or defeat (someone).
Adverb
- to a greater degree; more.
- more suitably, appropriately, or usefully.
Better the Adjective
To start off, thinking of better as an adjective (or a word that describes a noun) is useful. I know this ins’t a grammar lesson, but who doesn’t love a little grammar? (…probably everyone).
Instead of thinking of yourself as a better composer, you can reimagine that as a more appropriate composer, or a well advised composer.
As a composer, in any area from concert to film, you have to be appropriate. If I get a commission for children’s choir and orchestra (something I currently am doing), I need to be able to write appropriately for that choir. If for instance, I add too much brass at the wrong times, you just won’t hear them.
Well advised, is really about understanding these aspects, knowing where to place your effort.
Better the Verb
This may make more sense if I use it in a sense.
“Jon bettered the other composer.”
Remember, verbs are action words, so they really need to be tied to some specific outcome or goal for yourself. You don’t necessarily have to better an opponent. Instead, think of yourself as the opponent. To better myself is to be better than I was before, in any capacity.
If you can clarify how you want to improve specifically. This could be expanded to any specific compositional goal.
Better the Adverb
Finally, an adverb modifies or describes a verb (side note, I think adjectives should just be called Adnouns, it would make all these terms make more sense).
I like this simplicity of thinking of better as “to a greater degree; more.” Sometimes, better will be a matter of output. If you put out more music, you will become better.
Synthesizing these definitions into a better definition of better… get it!
Let’s synthesize!
To be a better composer is to be a more appropriate composer, or a well advised composer, given your musical and emotional goals, which will allow you to create more music and eventually to improve those musical and emotional goals, bettering yourself.
And thus you will start the endless cycle of composerly self-improvement.
Musical and Emotional Goals
I think there is a part here, that is once again, very ambiguous. It’s the musical and emotional goals.
Now, I’ve surveyed the Art of Composing audience on and off for years, and something that always comes up is the term “Express Myself” or “Express my emotions”.
Express My Emotions
This is something interesting to me, because expressing yourself actually doesn’t seem to mean much on the surface. That’s why it’s so difficult to do. Unlike the last word, express is basically a verb.
Express the Verb
- convey (a thought or feeling) in words or by gestures and conduct.
- say or otherwise communicate what one thinks or means.
- squeeze out (liquid or air).
- GENETICS: cause (an inherited characteristic or gene) to appear in a phenotype.
These are all very interesting.
The first two have a lot to do with your opinions. And I hate to say it, but most people don’t want to hear your opinion. But if we take the idea that the feelings are actually more important than your opinions, it becomes a little more inline with what composers do.
Music doesn’t really convey clear ideas in any meaningful sense. Yes you can have programmatic music that hints at certain ideas, or actions, but really it is much more emotional, or at least, there seems to be some kind of impenetrable layer between what music can signal, and what words can signal.
But emotionally, thinking of squeezing out your feelings by gesture and conduct to communicate what one feels… that is a great way to think about expressing emotions.
Number 4, causing an inherited characteristic to appear, is a really interesting idea, especially given what we’ve learned about Epigenetics, which is the study of biological mechanisms that will switch genes on and off.
The harder you work to express your emotions, the higher the chances of having the right kinds of epigenetic changes to make that easier to do in the future.
Basically, the more you express your emotions, the more you can express your emotions.
When are Emotions Expressed?
The question becomes, what leads to expressing emotions in music.
When I think of my emotions being expressed, it is usually not at the beginning of a composition. It is at the end.
For instance, I’ve cried while writing. It usually happens after working on a piece for a long time, and it always requires hearing it. Hearing could be playback from the DAW or notation software, or it could be playing it myself at the piano. I don’t think I’ve ever just expressed emotions thinking about the music.
But this has to be tested further. I can’t really make any definitive statements about it yet.
So Why Does Art of Composing Exist
Let’s synthesize again!
To be a better composer is to be a more appropriate composer, or a well advised composer, given your musical and emotional goals, which will allow you to create more music and eventually to improve those musical and emotional goals, bettering yourself.
+
But emotionally, thinking of squeezing out your feelings by gesture and conduct to communicate what one feels… that is a great way to think about expressing emotions.
=
Art of composing exists to create more appropriate and well advised composers, that are able to create more music and improve that music, so that it meets your own emotional and musical goals, and allows you to squeeze out your feelings by gesture and conduct to communicate what you feel through music.
Me
It’s a mouthful, and it’s a little confusing, but it’s also a great start.
Hopefully we all want to be better composers, given this definition.
By the way, I’m not doing this for laughs, I actually care. And this blog is really how I think through these issues. I’d love to hear your feedback, and your own definitions.
Why should Art of Composing exist?
Jorge Dupuy
Thanks Jon for making Art of Composing exist this far. It’s not easy to bring together this amount of knowledge and experience. I hope to become better than myself everyday.
Eric-Mickya Liwata
Hi, Jon.
I know that this and the previous article really try to dig deep into what “good” or “better” mean, but it actually occurred to me that you could just drop the word “better” away. Hence: “Art of Composing exists to make composers”. At least that what happened to me as I started really making music after I went through your original “How to compose music” course.
I tried the “Vocabulary of Composing” too, but I actually liked original course better. I think the first course went more straight into the point and got me doing some composing work faster although I had to look some things and terms up myself. Of course, there is certain wisdom on delving in the basics thoroughly. However, (at least for me) after getting some examples and the basic idea (pun was not originally intended) on how to compose, I’ve mainly got better simply by doing more music – more I did better it usually got.
Although, at some point there seemed to appear a certain cap above which is difficult to get. I’ve actually wondered how this seems to happen to most my favorite composers too (from my perspective); at some point people do really amazing work after which things don’t seem to surpass what they did earlier. Maybe it’s just that the progress slows down going on as you need to work harder to make equally significant improvements as before. Maybe there is also chance involved as sometimes some pieces are – for what ever reasons – unexplainably better than usual. One my favorite composer told about it in an interview that it’s like making food; some times the recipe turned out better for some reason and you never can recreate it again.
(Anyway, I went out of tangent here – I try to end this reply soon.)
So, yeah, to summarize: I think you can’t forget simple hard work in getting better. Although there will always be insights that get you through barriers that you could not pass before. However, the overall progress gets more incremental as you go. Maybe sharing the basics of composing in ever more efficient way is what “Art of Composing” does best – dunno, you decide 🙂
Anyway thanks for the work you do, it really helped me at least when I started. And sorry for a long post.
Jon Brantingham
This is exactly the kind of comment I was hoping to receive on this post.
I actually really like that way of putting it. “Art of Composing exists to make composers.” If I can help people start off on a strong foot, that I think it is worthwhile.
I do like your point, about focusing on the basics and just writing more music. Sometimes I think progress in my own composing after a while has more to do with the situations I place myself (having to score a film, arrangements, etc) than it does with what I’m specifically studying.
With that being said, I do see quite a few composers that have continued to improve their quality as they grow older. Beethoven (even after going deaf), Mahler, Mozart, Schubert – I think they all did their best work near the end of their lives. It’s not that I’ll ever reach their capabilities. It’s more about the idea that you can continue to improve.
Thanks for the comment.
Neeraj
Heyyyy Jonnnnnn, You have been thinking quite deep about this. I was giving it a thought as well. Here in India, a composer A R Rahman (Slumdog Millionaire fame) who also won 2 oscars. I would also suggest you to explore his music. His music seems so perfect that other musicians seem pretty far from his level. But then it raises so many questions. What are the standards he has been setting? Of course one thing is he comes with beautiful melodies, always goes beyond 4 chords, the modulation is also very regular in his music and Orchestration seems perfect as well. So would you say there have been standards set for great music? We just need to look closely. Or are the standards dynamic in nature? Because if we have same elements of music like melody, harmony rhythm etc. Why is it hard to have a list of standards to check off when we compose? Thank you!
Jon Brantingham
Neeraj,
I think we’ll never have that list of standards that everyone agrees upon, simple because music accomplishes and means so many different things to people.
What we can always do is look at what a person does stylistically and emulate them, but at a certain point, the human desire to change stuff will take over. Bach’s list would be different from Beethoven, Mahler, Ravel, John Williams, and A. R. Rahman’s.
I am not familiar with his music in particular, but I will make an effort to listen to it. I would recommend actually taking a piece or a cue of his that you like, and do your best to analyze it. Start with the things that really stick out to you.
Neeraj
Thank You Jon for your insights! You are right about analysing the uniqueness. I am on to read the book ‘Style Analysis’ you recommended. :). Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge and thoughts. I am upset with you discontinuing your daily vlogs. But I am sure you are doing something very important with your time. And hope to see new courses from you soon. Take care Jon 🙂
Jon Brantingham
Thanks Neeraj.
Robyn
I’m grateful it does exist. I took music theory back in the early 1970s and basically sucked: the two years spent left me with the impression this will never be a medium of self expression… I just “lack the talent”. Your site has given me renewed hope. I’m looking forward to taking your more advanced course, but the introductory course is providing me with just the right challenges I’ve been looking for.
I’m pretty sure, now, I’ll need to invest in some sort of keyboard, though. All in good time.
Jon Brantingham
Thanks Robyn. All in good time indeed.
Harold Purvis
Hi Jon
Thanks for your article which makes much sense.
Jon Brantingham
Thanks Harold.